spinor representation

From Mathematics wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Motivation

SO(3) is defined to be the set of linear transformations that preserve the inner product of two vectors in \mathbb{R}^3\,. To that end, consider the vector with components r^i\, and form the 2\times2\, matrix

r = r^i \sigma_i\, (summation implicit)

where \sigma_i\, are the three Pauli matrices. Explicitly,

	r= \left(
\begin{matrix}
  r^3 & r^1-i r^2 \\
  r^1+i r^2 & -r^3 
\end{matrix}\right)
.

It follows that \operatorname{tr}\, r = 0\, and \det\, r = -\Vert \mathbf{r}\Vert^2\,. Also, r\, is Hermitian. All three these properties are preserved under unitary transformations. Furthermore, since

\sigma_i \sigma_j = \delta_{ij} \cdot I + i \varepsilon_{ijk} \sigma_k \,,

it is easy to see that

r^i = \frac{1}{2}\operatorname{tr}\, (r \sigma_i)\,,

which also implies

(1)
\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{v} = r^i v^i = \frac{1}{2}\operatorname{tr}\, (r^\dagger v)\,.

What is the effect of a special orthogonal transformation on r^i\,, i.e., r^i \to r^{ i\prime} = O^i_j r^j\,? It is a linear function on the elements of r\, that preserves the inner product (1):

r \to U_L r U_R\,,

so that

\operatorname{tr} ( r^\dagger v ) = \operatorname{tr} ( U_R^\dagger r U_L^\dagger U_L v U_R) = \operatorname{tr} (r^\dagger v)\qquad \forall \,u,v\,,

so that U_R U_R^\dagger = U_L^\dagger U_L = 1\,, i.e., U_L, U_R \in U(2)\,. However, it must also preserve the Hermiticity of r\,, so that U_R = U_L^\dagger\,[1]:

r \to U r U^\dagger\,.

For definiteness, we may require that any U\, be smoothly connected to the identity, so we choose \det U = 1\, and U \in SU(2)\,.

Finally, the bijection should preserve group multiplication, so that

\mathbf{r} \to \mathbf{r}\,' = O' (O \mathbf{r}) = (O' O) \mathbf{r}\,,

implies

r \to r' = U' U r U^\dagger U^{'\dagger} = (U'U) r (U'U)^{\dagger}\,,

where U'U\, is the transformation corresponding to O'O\,.

The matrices U\, form a representation of SO(3)\,, known as the spinor representation, and act on a complex vector space of two-component objects called spinors, via \psi \to \psi^' = U \psi\,. Note that the transformation law r \to r' = U r U^{\dagger}\, is also the transformation law obeyed by the outer product of two spinors, namely \psi \chi^{\dagger} \to U \psi \chi^{\dagger} U^{\dagger}\,. We have therefore learned that vectors transform under the direct product of the spinor representation SU(2)\, with itself.

Note that if U \in SU(2)\, corresponds to O \in SO(3)\,, then so does -U \in SU(2)\,. Thus SU(2)\, is the double cover of SO(3)\,.

Construction

From SU(2) to SO(3)

Since

r \to r' = O^i_j r^j \sigma_i = r^j U \sigma_j U^{\dagger}\,,

we require that

 O^i_j \sigma_i = U \sigma_j U^{\dagger}\,,

from which

 O^i_j = \frac{1}{2} \operatorname{tr}\,\left(U \sigma_j U^{\dagger} \sigma_j\right)\,.

Axis-angle form

We can write an arbitrary element of SU(2)\, as

U = e^{i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \frac{\vec{\sigma}}{2}}\,.

Now, recall the identity for Pauli matrices:

e^{i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \frac{\vec{\sigma}}{2}} = \cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) + i \hat{n}\cdot\vec{\sigma} \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\,.

Writing

r' = e^{i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \frac{\vec{\sigma}}{2}} r e^{-i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \frac{\vec{\sigma}}{2}}\,,

the brave reader will obtain:

X = n_x \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)
Y = n_y \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)
Z = n_z \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)
W = \cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)

O = 
\begin{bmatrix}
1-2(Y^2+Z^2) & 2XY + 2ZW    & 2XZ - 2YW\\
2XY - 2ZW    & 1-2(X^2+Z^2) & 2YZ + 2XW\\
2XZ + 2YW    & 2YZ - 2XW    & 1-2(X^2+Y^2)\\
\end{bmatrix}

From SO(3) to SU(2)

See also

References

  1. Relaxing this condition gives the spinor representation of SO(4)
Personal tools